The Bishop of Rome asks a pertinent question in his encyclical
Spe Salvi or
Saved in Hope:
How could the idea have developed that Jesus's message is narrowly individualistic and aimed only at each person singly? How did we arrive at this interpretation of the “salvation of the soul” as a flight from responsibility for the whole, and how did we come to conceive the Christian project as a selfish search for salvation which rejects the idea of serving others?
I also found his explanation of the nature of freedom to be interesting:
Since man always remains free and since his freedom is always fragile, the kingdom of good will never be definitively established in this world. Anyone who promises the better world that is guaranteed to last for ever is making a false promise; he is overlooking human freedom. Freedom must constantly be won over for the cause of good. Free assent to the good never exists simply by itself. If there were structures which could irrevocably guarantee a determined—good—state of the world, man's freedom would be denied, and hence they would not be good structures at all.
More to come.
4 comments:
The first quote makes him look Protestant...
:)
John,
You should start posting again. It's an ethical obligation.
-William
Ethical, spiritual and relational...
William -- can you have a chat to young John? Methinks he needs to blog again.
Post a Comment